Current threats and challenges to the settlement of the Armenian Question and the legal, political, diplomatic and civilizational bases and ways to overcome them
(State of Armenia, Republic of Armenia and Western Armenia)
«…դո՛ւ, որ վաղուց ես կոչվում ժողովուրդ,
թեպետ ակամա դեռ ժողովված չես,
տակավին ցիր ես, ցան ես եւ սփյուռք,-
դու այսուհետեւ ժողովվես պիտի
նախ՝ ինքդ քո մե՛ջ,
եւ ապա՝ քո շո՛ւրջ՝
հիշելով, որ այս ջարդ-կոտորածը, նախճիր եղեռնը
երե՛կ չսկսվեց, երե՜կ չսկսվեց…
5000 տարվա,
500 տարվա,
եւ 50 տարվա
պատմություն ունի այդ ջարդ-սպանդը, նախճիր-եղեռնը,
որ չի՛ ավարտվել ու չի՜ ավարտվում։»
Պարույր Սեւակ, «Եռաձայն պատարագ,
Փետրվար, 1965, Երեւան
Հայաստանի շուրջ եւ Հայաստանի ներսում ծավալվող իրադարձությունների հեռահար նպատակն ու տրամաբանությունն այն է, որ 1920 թվականի սեպտեմբեր – դեկտեմբերի իրադարձությունների օրինակով, հայ ժողովրդին պարտադրվի մի նոր պայմանագիր, որով Հայաստանը հրաժարվի դիմադրությունից, պաշտպանությունից եւ իրեն տրված բոլոր իրավունքներից։
Այս նպատակներին հասնելու համար թշնամիների գործադրած ջանքերը հետեւյալն են․
ա) վեց տարի շարունակ, ամենօրյա ռեժիմով քարոզչությունը (այն տպավորությունն է, որ կարծես, որեւէ այլ կարեւոր գործ չունեն անելու, բացի հայերին ահաբեկելուց) եւ
բ) ծախսված ահռելի ֆինանսական միջոցները (միլիարդավոր դոլարներ) եւ մարդկային կորուստները (շուրջ 25 հազար սպանված զինվոր ու սպա),
որոնք ուղիղ նշում են հայ ժողովրդի իրական ներուժի մասին։
Հայ ժողովրդի թշնամիները դրսից (մեծ կոալիցիա) եւ հինգերորդ շարասյունը՝ ներսից (Քաղաքացիական պայմանագիր կուսակցություն), նախօրոք մշակված ագրեսիայի, Հայոց բանակի կազմալուծման, պարտադրված պատերազմի ու պարտության սցենարներով, բռնությամբ, ուժի սպառնալիքով ու սադրանքներով ձգտում են Հայաստանին պարտադրել մի նոր պայմանագիր, որով Հայաստանի Հանրապետությունը կհրաժարվի հայ ժողովրդին ու Հայաստանին տրված բոլոր իրավունքներից։ Այսինքն, դա մի նոր փորձ է կասեցնելու Հայկական Հարցի կարգավորումը, ինչպես դա արվել է 1920 թվականին։
«Հերիք է, որ մի ժողովուրդ դառնա անհայրենասեր,
որպեսզի համարվի որս, եւ նրա Երկիրը բաժանվի իր հարեւանների միջեւ»։
Գարեգին Նժդեհ
1. Recognition of the independence of the Armenian State – State of Armenia
The independence of the state of Armenia was recognized on January 19, 1920.
At the end of the First World War, the victorious states convened a conference, the Paris Peace Conference, to define a Peace Treaty. It sat from January 18, 1919 to January 21, 1920, with some interruptions.
The conference was attended by representatives of Great Britain, France, Italy, Japan, Belgium, Greece, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Armenia, the Kingdom of Serbia, Croatia and Slovenia, Hejaz and other allied states. The main conditions for peace were presented by the Prime Ministers of France – Georges Clemenceau –, of Great Britain – Lloyd George and the President of the United States of America – Woodrow Wilson.
In response to the demands presented by the assembled Armenian National Delegation, the Supreme Council of the Allied Powers, having recognized de facto the State of Armenia, adopted on January 19, 1920 the following decisions:
1. The Government of Armenia is recognized as a State;
2. This decision does not determine the question of the borders of the Armenian State.
That is, the state of Armenia is 104 years old. The recognition of the state occurs once and that decision is not subject to change or cancellation in the future.
2. The Paris Peace Conference and the borders of the state of Armenia
Thus, in the future, regarding the State of Armenia or the borders of the State of Armenia, it is necessary to carry out
1. On the Turkish side, the implementation of the Arbitral Award of the 28th President of the United States of America Woodrow Wilson.
2. On the Azerbaijani side, the implementation of the provisions of the “Report of the proposals of the Commission charged with deciding on the borders of Armenia” issued during the Special Commission of the Paris Peace Conference on February 24, 1920 for the question of the borders of Armenia.
It is worth noting that the Decisions of these two documents – Arbitral Award and Special Commission for the Armenian Borders – were included in Articles 89 and 92 of the Peace Treaty of Sèvres.
Article 89 of the Treaty of Sevres states: “Turkey and Armenia and the other Parties to the Treaty agree to submit to the arbitration of the President of the United States of America the definition of the frontiers between Turkey and Armenia for the vilayets of Erzurum, Trebizond, Van, Bitlis, to take into account his decisions and to include any measures he may recommend for a frontier access of Armenia to the sea, a demilitarization of all Ottoman territory along the Armenian frontiers”.
Article 92 states: “The frontiers of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia will be determined on the basis of a mutual agreement between them. After the implementation of the decisions of Article 89 and if the States in question do not agree on the delimitation of their frontiers, these will be determined by the Principal Allied Powers who will be responsible for establishing them on the spot”.
USA President Woodrow Wilson’s Acceptance To The President Of The Supreme Council Of The Allied Powers, November 22, 1920։ “It was essential to keep in mind that the new state of Armenia, including as it will a large section of the former Armenian provinces of Transcaucasian Russia…”
Wilson’s words refer to Artsakh, Nakhichevan, Gardman, Utik and other Armenian-populated territories and regions.
These decisions are registered in the register of the League of Nations and its successor, the United Nations, and are binding for execution.
Decree of the Council of People’s Commissars of Russia “On Turkish Armenia” (On Western Armenia) of December 29, 1917 (January 11, 1918)։ “The Council of People’s Commissars declares to the Armenian people that the Workers’ and Peasants’ Government of Russia supports the right of the Armenians of the occupied “Turkish Armenia” to free self-determination up to and including complete independence.” First Constitution of the RSFSR, July 10, 1918, Article 6. “The III All-Russian Congress of Soviets welcomes the policy of the Council of People’s Commissars, which proclaimed the complete independence of Finland, began the withdrawal of troops from Persia, and declared freedom of self-determination for Armenia.”
Nevertheless, the adoption of the mandate of Armenia was discussed in the US Senate from May 29 to June 1, 1920, which means that the United States of America de facto recognized the right and title of the state of Armenia to Armenian territories and thereby annulled the right and title Ottoman Empire in these territories.
3. Demarcation of the border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan
As we have already mentioned in the previous section, there are two decisions regarding the demarcation between Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan. The decision of the Special Commission of the Paris Peace Conference: “Report and Proposals of the Commission for Determining the Boundaries of Armenia” of February 24, 1920 and Article 92 of the Sevres Peace Treaty.
Let us add that according to the “Report Proposal” of February 24, 1920, the demarcation will be carried out taking into account the national distribution data that existed before the First World War.
As a result of a crime, in this case, as a result of the Genocide of Armenians, Greeks, Assyrians and other peoples, new data on national distribution cannot serve as a basis for legal-political, diplomatic-civilizational decisions.
Because “Crime does not give rise to law” – “Ex injuria non oritur jus”.
Accordingly, the demarcation between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan cannot be carried out on the basis of the maps of the General Staff of the Army of the Soviet Union.
4. State of Armenia, Western Armenia
At the beginning of 1919, the Armenian National Congress was convened in Paris, one of the most important decisions of which was the election of the “Armenian United National Delegation” (“Delegation of an Integrated Armenia”) co-chaired by Poghos Nubar and Avetis Aharonian and the approval of a joint Memorandum on the demands of the Armenians, which had been prepared in advance and presented by the Armenian United National Delegation at the Paris Peace Conference on February 12, 1919. This Memorandum substantiated the need to create an independent Armenian state and specified its territory, which united the seven vilayets (regions) of Western Armenia (including Trebizond), the Republic of Armenia and Cilicia.
On February 26, 1919, the Armenian United National Delegation appeared at a meeting of the Council of Ten, where it repeated the main demands of the Memorandum. On April 17, 1919, the delegation was received by the 28th President of the United States, Woodrow Wilson, who assured that he would do everything possible to protect the territorial demands of the Armenians.
The Arbitral Award of the 28th President of the United States Woodrow Wilson on November 22, 1920, included four of the seven vilayets of Western Armenia within the borders of the state of Armenia. Article 89 of the Sevres Peace Treaty includes them: “The vilayets of Erzurum, Trebizond, Van and Bitlis”.
It should be specially emphasized that the Paris Peace Conference, in accordance with the demands presented by the Armenian joint delegation, envisions two entities within the state of Armenia: the Republic of Armenia and the Armenians of Western Armenia. Moreover, it envisions the Armenians of Western Armenia along with the living area of their historical and civilizational residence, that is, the administrative territory of Western Armenia, which is included in the Armenian Question dossier, as the seven vilayets of Western Armenia. In other words, he considered the Republic of Armenia (Eastern Armenia) and the Armenians of Western Armenia (Western Armenia) as a single whole, as Armenia, as the Armenian State or the State of Armenia.
5. British intelligence officer Lawrence of Arabia and the mandate of Armenia
In 1919, the famous British intelligence officer Lawrence of Arabia gave a long interview to the American journalist Lincoln Stevens. We are interested in this interview in a paragraph. Lawrence of Arabia says: “․․․Armenia was to be divided. The back country, where the natural wealth is, was to be cut off from the front, where there is nothing but Armenians. The American mandate was to be over the Armenians; some other ally-not the British, but another equally practical power-was to get Armenia”․
Later, this is exactly how this program was implemented towards the Armenian people and Armenia. The Armenians subjected to the Genocide and Forced Migration were scattered around the world, essentially under European and American “mandates”, and the “mandate” for Armenia was given to Russia. Here, instead of mandate, we should understand control, which is why the word mandate is taken in quotation marks.
It is important to note the year of the interview: 1919. In other words, it was at this time that the Paris Peace Conference began, which also discussed issues related to Armenian rights.
It should be noted that the settlement of the Armenian issue, the realization of the rights of the Armenian people and the rights of the Armenian state to exist in accordance with the program proposed by the Lawrence of Arabia were postponed for approximately 100 years.
The current attempt, which we are witnessing, is aimed at once again suspending the settlement of the Armenian issue.
6. The First, Second and Third Republics of Armenia
The First Republic of Armenia, subsequently the Second Republic of Armenia under the conditions of aggression and coercion (the Alexandropol Treaty of 02.12.1920 and the Kars Treaty of 13.10.1921) renounced the rights granted to the Armenian people in 1920 regarding unified Armenian claims, being forced to remain only within the jurisdiction of the Republic of Armenia, that is to say Eastern Armenia and the Armenians of Eastern Armenia.
The first president of the Third Republic of Armenia spread the thesis “Armenia’s strength is Armenia’s weakness.”
The Third Republic of Armenia in accordance with the official statements of its Presidents renounced the rights granted to the Armenian people in 1920 according to the unified Armenian requirements for Armenians in Western Armenia and Western Armenia itself, and they transfer the task of solving this problem to the Armenian people, to wide pan-Armenian circles.
The current Prime Minister of the Third Republic of Armenia, developing the thesis of the premier president of the republic, pushes the Armenian people and Armenia towards defeat and capitulation, towards the signing of a new treaty of Alexandropol or Kara imposed by force and menace, effectively leaving the Republic of Armenia once more outside the framework of the rights accorded to the Armenian people and the Armenian State (State d’Arménie) in 1918-1920.
Thus, during the thirty last years, the Lawrence of Arabia program was implemented and the solution to the Armenian question was reported due to the fact that Armenia does not have sufficient forces to continue on the path of protecting rights. Il s’agit d’un mensonge flagrant, designed pour cacher et contourner soigneusement la vérité. More information on this topic below.
7. The Declaration of Independence of Armenia
The Declaration of Independence of Armenia is a fundamental legal document adopted at the first session of the Supreme Soviet of the Armenian SSR on August 23, 1990, which proclaims the beginning of the process of establishing independent statehood and outlines the fundamental principles of Armenian statehood.
The Declaration of Independence of Armenia is the first political legal document in which the freely expressed will and rights of the Armenian people are enshrined, and it also serves as a roadmap for the Armenian people (every Armenian) in the aftermath of the Genocide, scattered across the planet Earth.
His Holiness the Supreme Patriarch and Catholicos of all Armenians, the primate of the Armenian Apostolic Church, Vazgen I, prepared special chrism, consecrated the holy chrism, and anointed the Declaration of Independence of the Republic of Armenia with it.
The Declaration of Independence cannot be altered: no one can change a foundational document in which the will of the people (their testament) and the rights of the people are enshrined.
8. Atropatena, Republic of Azerbaijan
Atropatene, also known as Media Atropatene, was an ancient Iranian kingdom established in c. 323 BC by the Persian satrap Atropates. The kingdom, centered in present-day northern Iran, was ruled by Atropates’ descendants until the early 1st-century AD, when the Parthian Arsacid dynasty supplanted them. It was conquered by the Sasanians in 226, and turned into a province governed by a marzban (“margrave”). Atropatene was the only Iranian region to remain under Zoroastrian authority from the Achaemenids to the Arab conquest without interruption, aside from being briefly ruled by the Macedonian king Alexander the Great (r. 336–323 BC).
The name of Atropatene was also the nominal ancestor of the name of the historic Azerbaijan region in Iran.
According to Strabo, the name of Atropatene derived from the name of Atropates, the commander of the Achaemenid Empire. As he writes in his book “Geography”: “Media is divided into two parts. One part of it is called Greater Media, of which the metropolis is Ecbatana. The other part is Atropatian Media, which got its name from the commander Atropates, who prevented also this country, which was a part of Greater Media, from becoming subject to the Macedonians”.[5][6]
From the name of Atropates, different forms of the name of this country such as Atropatene, Atropatios Mēdia, Tropatene, Aturpatakan, Adarbayjan were used in different sources. Nevertheless, medieval Arab geographers suggested another version associating this name with Adorbador (the name of a priest) that means “guardian of the fire”.
The main Achaemenid hub in Atropatene was Ganzak (from Median: Ganzaka, meaning “treasury”), which presumably served as the capital of Atropates and his successors. The city was situated in a fertile area near Lake Urmia, close to the modern town of Miandoab. The city and its surroundings probably hosted a large Iranian population, whereas much of the Atropatenian population had most likely not been completely Iranianized yet by the 3rd-century BC.
Atropatene was the only Iranian region to remain under Zoroastrian authority from the Achaemenids to the Arab conquest without any interruption, aside from being briefly ruled by the Macedonian king Alexander the Great (r. 336–323 BC).[21] Under the Atropatids, the region successfully managed to gain a dominant place in Zoroastrianism, which would continue into the Sasanian period, whose monarchs favored Median traditions over that of the Parthians. Moreover, Atropatene also served as a stronghold of Iranian culture.
The artificial state called Azerbaijan, the so-called Republic of Azerbaijan, was created in May 1918. Many analysts call it a branch of British Petroleum.
9. Genocide of Armenian, Indigenous Genocide, Pan-Turkism
The Genocide of Armenians in Ottoman Turkey began in the 1870s after the emergence of the theory of Pan-Turkism. Twenty years later, the first implementer of this theory was Sultan Hamid. Later, the Young Turks and Kemalists continued the work…
The Armenian Genocide was carried out during 1894–1923. from the three successive governments of Turkey: the Sultan, the Young Turks and the Kemalists, and later the republican․ Carried out in the Ottoman Empire, Western Armenia, Cilicia, Eastern Armenia, Baku, Shushi… Throughout the living space of the Armenian people.
Moreover, the same policy of state terrorism was carried out against other ancient peoples of the Middle East: the Greeks, Assyrians, Yazidis…
Turkey’s Greek, Armenian, and Assyrian Christians, who predominated in the region before its colonisation by Turkic Muslims, were subjected to a “staggered campaign of genocide” from 1894 to 1924, which reduced them from 20 per cent of the population to less than 2 per cent, according to Israeli researchers. (Israeli Researchers: Turkey’s Greek, Armenian, and Assyrian Christians Destroyed by “30-year Genocide”, by Jack Montgomery, 19 May 2019)
Currently, his follower is the President of the Republic of Turkey Erdogan.
In the Western Caspian region in 1911, after its foundation, his follower was the Musavat Party, and since 1918 – all the governments of the so-called Republic of Azerbaijan, up to the present day, including the current President Ilham Aliyev.
The Genocide Armenian was carried out between 1918 and 2023 by the Musavat Party and the governments of three republics of Azerbaijan – in Baku (1918), Shushi (1920), Nakhichevan, Sumgait (1988), Baku (1990), Shahumyan, Gandzak, Utik, Gardman, Artsakh – through the blockade of Artsakh, ethnic cleansing, deportation and genocide of the Armenians of Artsakh.
Moreover, the same policy of state terrorism was carried out against other indigenous peoples of the Western Caspian region: Talysh, Lezgins, Avars, Udis… etc.
On the one hand, these horrific crimes are the enormous human and material losses inflicted on the Armenian, Greek, Assyrian, Yezidi, and Talysh, Lezgi, Avar, Udi, and other peoples, and on the other, the blatant fact that the Genocide against these peoples has not stopped and continues to this day.
The effective means of protection against genocide is the organization of nationwide and comprehensive defense.
10. Cultural Genocide against the heritage of indigenous peoples
In addition to the genocide of the peoples living in Ottoman Turkey, the Republic of Turkey, the Western Caspian Sea region and the so-called Republic of Azerbaijan, cultural genocide has been committed against the national, cultural and civilizational heritage of these same peoples.
According to official data, by the beginning of 1914, the total number of churches and monasteries in the territory of Western Armenia and the Ottoman Empire was 2,549 (including unique early Christian monuments of the 4th-5th centuries), most of which were robbed, burned and destroyed during the genocide.
According to UNESCO data from 1974, after 1923, out of 913 surviving Armenian historical and architectural monuments, 464 were completely destroyed, 252 were in ruins, and 197 were in need of major restoration. And today there is almost nothing left to restore – Türkiye systematically destroyed them.
The Republic of Azerbaijan is a state whose government destroyed and continues to destroy many of the greatest ancient monuments, churches the cultural heritage of the Armenian people. An eloquent example of this is the fact of the destruction of 89 medieval Armenian churches, 5480 khachkars and 22.700 tombstones, including 400 khachkars in Agulis and the destruction of thousands of medieval original and ancient khachkars of Djuga in Nakhichevan in 2005.
The policies and practices of the Armenian genocide, Armenian phobia, the persecution of Armenians, the destruction of Armenian cultural and civilizational values, as well as the falsification of Armenian culture and the appropriation of cultural values by the governments of Turkey and Azerbaijan continue to this day.
The UN defines the destruction of cultural monuments as a genocide and a crime of war against humanity.
11. The issue of compensation for material losses caused to the Armenian people during the First World War
In 1919, according to the calculation of the Special Committee operating within the Special Commission of the Paris Peace Conference, the material losses of the Armenian people during the First World War amounted to 19 billion (19,130,982,000) French francs, which today is 286,964,730,000 billion euros or 312,791,555,700 billion US dollars. (1)
Until today, the Republic of Turkey has not compensated the Armenians for that amount.
This decision on compensation and reparation does not address the numerous and multifaceted losses inflicted on the Armenian people by Turkey and Azerbaijan as a result of the long chain of the Genocide Armenian, including human, spiritual, cultural, historical-architectural, financial and other losses. Turkey carried out the Armenian Genocide from 1894-1896 and continues to this day. Azerbaijan carried out the Armenian Genocide from 1918 and continues to this day.
There are two ways to stop the genocide: protection and conviction of the perpetrators.
12. Pan-Turkism as a nationalistic, aggressive and dangerous theory
The theory of pan-Turkism is a very dangerous, aggressive and nationalist theory, which is a great threat to all the peoples and states of the Middle East, the Caucasus, Asia. Including for peoples and states of Turkic origin. Pan-Turkism cannot be controlled, it is an uncontrollable theory. Pan-Turkism is capable of turning any region and state into chaos, including all the above-mentioned regions. In that sense, it is more correct to prevent the threat than to make superhuman efforts to neutralize it later.
The theory of pan-Turkism, as a dangerous, aggressive and nationalist theory, should be condemned and banned, like fascism, among them, the current leaders of the two states that adhere to the theory of pan-Turkism, the Republics of Turkey and Azerbaijan, should also be condemned.
Among Muslim states, you will not find another state that encourages genocide and destruction of nations, the destruction of their cultural values – Cultural Genocide. In this sense, the following artificial state formations – Turkey and Azerbaijan – are not orthodox Muslim states. Islam does not preach the destruction of other nations and their cultures on the basis of national or religious affiliation.
The Caliph of the Arab Caliphate, Muhammad’s cousin and son-in-law, Imam Ali ibn Abi Talib, in his Covenant with the Christians of Armenia, strictly commands:“They should not be molested or oppressed. Their country should not be taken from them. They should not be alienated from their country. The priests should not be converted from Christianity. The monks and hermits should not be disturbed in their solitudes, nor removed from their monasteries. Their preachers should not be prohibited to preach. Their habitations and their hereditary lands should not be devastated. Nobody should remove or to pull down the bells from the steeples of their Churches. This is the law which I have made for them. But, those who shall infringe my Covenant, by disobeying my behests, shall be transgressors of the ordinance of God, and shall suffer severe punishments and eternal penalties”.
13. Armenia’s actions yesterday and today, defense of the country and protection of rights
We do not believe the claims that Armenia, the Armenian Army, the Armenian people do not have the potential to resist the Genocide states, and do not have friends. We understand that this is also being done for one purpose. As in 1920, so today, with the same methods and forms, to force the Armenian people to accept the signing of treaties imposed by the aggressors and genocidaires from the position of threat of force.
That is, the tasks of Armenia yesterday and today not only did not change, but became even more complicated. Therefore, the demand not met yesterday must be met today, and in short, we must quickly and competently prepare for a comprehensive all-national defense and protection of the rights of the Armenian people. It is preferable to organize the defense along the lines of the organization of the Swiss Armed Forces.
In the modern world, this is the only way to ensure the right of the Armenian people to existence, development and future.
14. In this situation, the entire Armenian people are a legal and political subject
In the 20th century and the beginning of the 21st century, genocides took place, which were carried out under the pretext of “ensuring” order, constitutionalism and other “justifications” in this or that country. Meanwhile, the real and ultimate goal of all these genocides is the redistribution of resources in favor of usurious capital, the manifestation of which is the global financial market. Genocide has been carried out against the indigenous people, the Armenians, in the Armenian Highlands and the adjacent civilizational area for 130 years. One stage of the plan to destroy the Armenians is the 44-day war against Artsakh, the blockade of Artsakh, the ethnic cleansing of the Armenians of Artsakh, forced deportation and genocide.
In this situation, the entire Armenian people are already a political subject, who are entitled to take all necessary measures to prevent new genocidal acts against them. The Armenian people all over the world, including the Republic of Armenia, using all their potential and capabilities, striving to find justice and support, have the right to appeal to the international community and international arbitration bodies on these issues… In parallel, they have the right to begin a new process of national defense and protection of rights. Such a coordinated action is of vital importance for the Armenian people. Having become such a political subject, they are able to undertake a just and final settlement of the Armenian Question, as well as to ensure their fundamental rights to exist, develop and have a future.
15. The role of the state of Armenia and the AIK national movement in the life of the Armenian people
The State of Armenia (Республика Западная Армения) confirms that it takes upon itself the protection of all rights granted to the Armenian people by the international community.
It is for this reason that in 2018 it was decided to send petitions to the UN, the UN Security Council, the European Parliament with a request to implement the rights granted to the Armenian people.
Accordingly, in 2024 On March 31, we announced that the State of Armenia (Republic of Western Armenia) is a full-fledged and legal representative in matters of protection and realization of the rights of the Armenian people, up to “Rights Claims”.
At the same time, we declare that the AIK is the only representative of the Armenian civilization, representing all Armenians and carrying out the civilizing mission of the Armenian people.
Additional material and documentation on the legal, political, historical, and civilizational justifications presented in this documentation will be presented by our expert structure as a separate Appendix and Note.
Martik Gasparyan
President of the State of Armenia (Republic of Western Armenia)
Tigran Pashabezyan
Prime Minister of the State of Armenia (Republic of Western Armenia)
Armen Ter-Sarkisian
Chairman of the National Assembly (Parliament) of Western Armenia
November 22, 2024
